翻译状态

9 字符串 100%
浏览 翻译
1283 单词 100%
8003 字符数 100%

字符串状态

字符串 单词 字符数
9 1283 8003
所有字符串 浏览 翻译 禅模式
9 1283 8003
已翻译字符串 浏览 翻译 禅模式

其他部件

部件 已翻译 未完成 未完成的词 未完成的字符数 未翻译 检查 建议 评论
8-Unity-Choices MIT 37% 15 15 56 15 0 0 0
2-CS-MonoBehaviour MIT 88% 3 8 60 3 0 0 0
4-Unity-m_text_BIOSText MIT 61% 52 945 6545 52 0 0 0
6-Unity-TextMeshPro MIT 59% 719 4943 32276 719 0 3 3
1-CS-DebugLog MIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0-CS-Header MIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3-CS-AddNewHostMessage MIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7-Extra MIT 71% 6 26 144 6 0 0 2
浏览所有部件

概览

项目网站 translate.ws3917.space
给译者的说明
翻译许可证 MIT License
翻译进程
  • 可以直接翻译。
  • 可以提出翻译建议。
  • 只允许指定的用户贡献。
  • 该翻译使用单语文件。
  • 该翻译的基础语言可以修改。
文件掩码 drhps/image/*.json
单语言译文模版语言文件 drhps/image/en.json
翻译文件 下载 drhps/image/zh_CN.json
最后更改 2025年3月3日 12:13
最后更改方 None
语言 中文（简体）
语言代码 zh_Hans
文字方向 从左至右
区分大小写 不区分大小写
语言使用者数量 1286095292
复数数量 1
复数类型 无
复数形式
复数公式 0
12 小时前

字符串统计数据

字符串百分比 托管的字符串数 字数百分比 托管的单词数 字符百分比 托管的字符数
总数 9 1283 8003
已翻译数 100% 9 100% 1283 100% 8003
需要编辑 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
只读 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
未通过的检查数 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
带有建议的字符串数 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
未翻译的字符串数 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
过去 12 个月 上一年

过去 12 个月内的活动

0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 0 个更改 33 个更改
3 月4 月5 月6 月7 月8 月9 月10 月11 月12 月1 月2 月

快速统计

1283
托管的单词数
9
托管的字符串数
100%
已翻译
3
贡献者
及之前 30 天

过去 30 天的趋势

+100%
托管的单词数
—
+100%
托管的字符串数
—
+100%
已翻译
—
+100%
贡献者
—
无

已提交更改
已提交更改 12 小时前
ABB

接受了建议
MONSTERS ARE WEAK

I managed to get a hypothetical through to them, one I wrote myself!

For as long as we can remember, we’ve only given host control to a few specific entities during longer simulation instances. They usually prioritize stronger, healthier entities to ensure the host is as optimal as possible for testing.

My hypothetical aimed to test this: what if a weak monster was chosen for host control?

For the first few days, all was fine. We had documented this entity’s daily routine and followed it as usual. Around day 3, the entity fainted from exhaustion and only woke up after they extracted the host control. I tried to argue against this but they didn’t listen. Cowards, I say.
怪物是弱小的

我设法将一个假设猜想传递给他们了！这全都是我自己写的！

从我们记事以来，在如此长久的模拟实例中，我们只会把宿主控制权交给一些特定的实体。他们会优先选择更强壮、更健康的实体，确保能通过测试。

我提出的猜想就是为了这个：如果让一个弱小的怪物来控制宿主会怎么样？

起初的几天，一切都很正常。我们记录了这个实体的日常活动，和平常一样去追踪它，大约在第三天，这个实体因为力竭而昏倒了，在他们取出了宿主的控制权后，这个实体才醒了过来。我想证明这是错误的，但他们不听。要我说，他们就是怂了。
12 小时前
ABB

添加了建议
MONSTERS ARE WEAK

I managed to get a hypothetical through to them, one I wrote myself!

For as long as we can remember, we’ve only given host control to a few specific entities during longer simulation instances. They usually prioritize stronger, healthier entities to ensure the host is as optimal as possible for testing.

My hypothetical aimed to test this: what if a weak monster was chosen for host control?

For the first few days, all was fine. We had documented this entity’s daily routine and followed it as usual. Around day 3, the entity fainted from exhaustion and only woke up after they extracted the host control. I tried to argue against this but they didn’t listen. Cowards, I say.
怪物是弱小的

我设法将一个假设猜想传递给他们了！这全都是我自己写的！

从我们记事以来，在如此长久的模拟实例中，我们只会把宿主控制权交给一些特定的实体。他们会优先选择更强壮、更健康的实体，确保能通过测试。

我提出的猜想就是为了这个：如果让一个弱小的怪物来控制宿主会怎么样？

起初的几天，一切都很正常。我们记录了这个实体的日常活动，和平常一样去追踪它，大约在第三天，这个实体因为力竭而昏倒了，在他们取出了宿主的控制权后，这个实体才醒了过来。我想证明这是错误的，但他们不听。要我说，他们就是怂了。
12 小时前
ABB

接受了建议
MONSTERS ARE WEAK

I managed to get a hypothetical through to them, one I wrote myself!

For as long as we can remember, we’ve only given host control to a few specific entities during longer simulation instances. They usually prioritize stronger, healthier entities to ensure the host is as optimal as possible for testing.

My hypothetical aimed to test this: what if a weak monster was chosen for host control?

For the first few days, all was fine. We had documented this entity’s daily routine and followed it as usual. Around day 3, the entity fainted from exhaustion and only woke up after they extracted the host control. I tried to argue against this but they didn’t listen. Cowards, I say.
怪物是弱小的

我通过这些，我提出了一个猜想，设法将一个假设传递给他们了！这全都是我自己写的！

从我们记事以来，在如此长久的模拟实例中，我们只会把宿主控制权交给一些特定的实体。他们会优先选择更强壮、更健康的实体，确保能通过测试。

我提出的猜想就是为了这个：如果让一个弱小的怪物来控制宿主会怎么样？

起初的几天，一切都很正常。我们记录了这个实体的日常活动，和平常一样去追踪它，大约在第三天，这个实体因为力竭而昏倒了，在他们取出了宿主的控制权后，这个实体才醒了过来。我想证明这是错误的，但他们不听。要我说，他们就是怂了。
12 小时前
无

资源已更新
已强制解析 “drhps/image/zh_CN.json” 文件。 13 天前
无

已提交更改
已提交更改 2 周前
ABB

添加了建议
MONSTERS ARE WEAK

I managed to get a hypothetical through to them, one I wrote myself!

For as long as we can remember, we’ve only given host control to a few specific entities during longer simulation instances. They usually prioritize stronger, healthier entities to ensure the host is as optimal as possible for testing.

My hypothetical aimed to test this: what if a weak monster was chosen for host control?

For the first few days, all was fine. We had documented this entity’s daily routine and followed it as usual. Around day 3, the entity fainted from exhaustion and only woke up after they extracted the host control. I tried to argue against this but they didn’t listen. Cowards, I say.
怪物是弱小的

我通过这些，我提出了一个猜想，设法将一个假设传递给他们了！这全都是我自己写的！

从我们记事以来，在如此长久的模拟实例中，我们只会把宿主控制权交给一些特定的实体。他们会优先选择更强壮、更健康的实体，确保能通过测试。

我提出的猜想就是为了这个：如果让一个弱小的怪物来控制宿主会怎么样？

起初的几天，一切都很正常。我们记录了这个实体的日常活动，和平常一样去追踪它，大约在第三天，这个实体因为力竭而昏倒了，在他们取出了宿主的控制权后，这个实体才醒了过来。我想证明这是错误的，但他们不听。要我说，他们就是怂了。
2 周前
ABB

修改了译文
EXPERIMENT LOG-00-B "DISCOVERY"
Logged Information

While actively testing basic host control with smaller bodies in the simulation, we embarked on a mission to explore the surrounding environment.

In this simulation instance, we took the form of what we believe to be a common house fly. Due to limitations and inexperience, we have not yet successfully enabled the host to consume food to sustain itself. Without nourishment, we could last only 2-3 days per instance at most. Nevertheless, we used multiple simulation instances to explore the environment and map out its common landmarks.

Our findings have provided *VALUABLE* information:

1) The environment consistently resembles a small urban town in the fall season.
2) It appears that only monsters and humans inhabit the simulation, no other types of beings have been documented so far.
3) There is a possibility that humans and monsters coexist in the same place, although only one human has been observed in the simulation so far.

The most intriguing discovery is that the simulation is generating memories for entities that never occurred.

We’ve been wracking our minds about how this is possible. Where could it be pulling this data from? Is it truly out of our control? Is there more that we have yet to uncover?
实验日志-00-B乙 “发现”
已记录信息

模拟环境中，在积极进行小机体基本宿主控制测试的同时，我们展开了对周围环境的探索任务。

本次模拟中，我们选择了通常被认为是普通家蝇的生物作为宿主。由于存在限制和经验的匮乏，我们尚未成功使宿主摄取食物以维持自身。没有营养供给，我们最多只能在每次模拟中维持2-3天。尽管如此，我们还是通过多个模拟实例对环境进行了探索，并标记了其中的常见地标。

我们的发现提供了*极有价值的*信息：

1）模拟环境始终呈现出一个秋季的小型城镇的景象。
2）模拟中似乎只有怪物和人类存在，尚未记录到其他类型的生物。
3）人类和怪物可能在此地共存，尽管目前在模拟中仅观察到一名人类。

最令人费解的发现是，模拟系统正在为从未真实存在过的实体生成记忆。

我们一直在深入思考这一现象的成因。这些数据究竟源自何处？这是否真的超出了我们的控制范围？是否还有更多未被发现的秘密等待我们去揭开？
2 周前
ABB

修改了译文
EXPERIMENT LOG-00-A "INTRODUCTION"

Objective
Become acquainted with the DELTARUNE universe and understand the foundational principles governing its structure, possible and/or guaranteed events and how any potential hosts for control.

Hypothesis
If the DELTARUNE universe follows predictable, consistent rules, then interactions within the simulated universe should yield repeatable results under controlled conditions. However, due to potential subtle changes in beings' agency and awareness, deviations from expected behaviors may suggest the presence of unknown forces or unchangeable influences within the simulation.

Experiment Design
1) Scope of the simulation
- Define the boundaries of the world, the limits at which it can run.
- Test how long a simulation can run before issues begin cropping up.

2) Variables and Control
- A limited test of how big of a change a small variable change may have.
- Search for a potential host to use as a gateway to the simulation.

Expected Result(s)
- A consistent timeline of events from start to a defined end.
- At least one potential host to be scouted out.
实验日志-00-A甲 “引言”

目标
熟悉三角符文宇宙，理解其结构的基本原理，包括可能发生和/或必然发生的事件，以及任何潜在的可控主体。

假设
如果三角符文宇宙遵循可预测且恒定的规则，那么在受控条件下，该模拟宇宙内的相互作用应产生可重复的结果。然而，由于生物的自主性和意识潜在的细微变化，与预期行为的偏差或许暗示着模拟中存在未知力量或不可改变的影响。

实验设计
1）模拟范围
- 定义世界边界，即模拟可运行的极限范围。
- 测试模拟在出现故障前能够持续运行的最长时间。
2）变量与对照
- 测试微小变量变化可能产生的影响范围。
- 寻找潜在宿主，作为进入模拟的通道。

预期结果
- 从起始点到设定终点的连贯事件时间线。
- 至少识别出一个潜在宿主以供进一步考察。
2 周前
ABB

修改了译文
EXPERIMENT LOG-01-B
"DARKER"
Logged Information

Recently, one of us discovered that the issue with the simulation crashing was due to a misspelling in the compile settings.

At first, we were nervous that the environment we saw could not be replicated, but luckily, that isn’t the case. Somehow, the supply closet consistently fails to exist. This is interesting since we have not changed any of our procedures for Kris when running the simulation for an extended period. Why has this changed suddenly?

Adventuring out of bounds again, we are no longer met with a crash when Kris awakens. Instead, we find the same peculiar environment, alongside many changes to Kris’s appearance.

Before, they wore a simple green and yellow sweater. Now, they are wearing a full set of armor. Adventuring forward, we located “Susie” as well. It appears this entity’s appearance has also changed—Susie behaves as she normally would, taking in this new environment with a realistic demeanor.

This world appears to be intentionally generated by the simulation and not the result of any external malfunction.

This would explain the performance issues we encountered in the past. From what we currently know, it’s clear the simulation is generating separate two worlds.

---
实验日志-01-B乙
“更加黑暗”
已记录信息

最近，我们中的一人发现，模拟崩溃的原因是编译设置中存在拼写错误。

起初，我们担心我们所看到的环境无法复现，但幸运的是，事实并非如此。不知何故，储物间始终无法正常生成。这很有趣，因为我们并没有改变在长时间运行模拟时对克里斯的操作流程。为什么会突然出现这种变化？
再次越界探索时，克里斯醒来时，我们不再遇到模拟崩溃的问题。相反，我们发现了一个同样的奇特环境，同时克里斯的外观也发生了许多变化。
先前，其身着一件简单的黄绿色毛衣。现在却是一整套盔甲。继续探索时，我们还找到了“苏西”。似乎这个实体的外观也有所改变——苏西表现如常，以一种切合实际的态度对待着这个新环境。
这个世界的生成似乎是有意为之，而不是由于任何外部故障导致的结果。
这或许可以解释我们过去遇到的性能问题。根据我们目前所知，很明显，模拟正在生成两个独立的世界。

---
2 周前
浏览翻译的所有变化